Convex for science parks

Artificial intelligence for science parks, incubators, and accelerators

The park team's own files, and a workspace each resident company can run without buying an AI stack of its own.

Request a consult for your park or program.

The landscape

Where a park actually needs an assistant

Resident companies are small. The park is the organization that holds the regulations, the landlord file, and the program. That is the archive worth making askable.

Member questions

Admission rules, lab access, IP policy, and rent terms are answered from the current document, the same way for every company that asks.

Programs and cohorts

Mentors and program managers draft briefs from the application, the last review, and the curriculum, instead of starting over each cohort.

Shared services

Facilities, safety, and the landlord's obligations live in one assistant the front desk can actually use.

A workspace per company

A resident team gets its own assistants and its own budget. One company's files are not retrieved for another.

Reporting to the sponsor

The quarterly note to the ministry, the university, or the investor is assembled from the numbers and the narratives you already have.

Cost that does not surprise the park

Dozens of small teams can join. You pay for the ones doing heavy work, and you can see who.

The results

The pattern these organizations sit inside

There is no serious survey of science parks alone. The relevant finding is about knowledge work across organizations, which is what a park's staff and its companies do.

88%

of organizations in McKinsey's 2025 global survey use AI in at least one business function, up from 78% a year earlier

McKinsey, The State of AI, 2025

Knowledge

management is now among the functions where respondents most often report AI use, beside IT and sales

McKinsey, The State of AI, 2025

Most

organizations are still experimenting or piloting. Reported enterprise-wide profit impact remains uncommon

McKinsey, The State of AI, 2025

One bill

is the practical constraint for a park: many teams, one procurement, a cap on each team

How Convex is sold — not an industry survey

Figures come from the published surveys and case reports named on each card. They describe those samples, not a promise of the same result.

Why Convex

What Convex puts in front of the team

The park keeps one deployment. Each company keeps its own documents and its own spend.

Several models

Pick the model for the task from several leading models, in one place.

Specialized assistants

An assistant for member services, and a separate workspace pattern for the companies inside the park.

A personal assistant

Each person has an assistant tuned to how they work.

Workspace assistants

Shared assistants that keep the company's context for the whole team.

Search over your documents

Answers come from your own procedures, contracts, and records, with the source attached.

Documents out

Word files and images today. CSV export is planned.

A cap per person

Token use is visible per person, and the spend can be exported.

Adoption dashboard

See where AI is actually being used, and where it is not.

Deployment

Cloud, or entirely on your own infrastructure

The same product. The difference is where the data sits.

Cloud

What is available today, hosted.

  • Access to several leading models
  • Specialized, personal, and workspace assistants
  • Search over the company's documents
  • Word documents and images
  • Token-use tracking and reports
  • Adoption dashboard

On-premise

Full control inside your environment, including a network with no outbound connection.

Everything in Cloud, plus:

  • Your own model endpoints
  • Offline licensing and payment for a disconnected site
  • Assistants and workflows built for your process

Start with the member handbook

If the front desk can answer from it with a citation, the rest of the program is the same shape.